Why American Management Rules the World
by Nicholas Bloom, Rebecca Homkes, Raffaella Sadun, and John
Van Reenen JUNE 13, 2011
After a decade of painstaking research, we have concluded
that American firms are on average the best managed in the world. Over the past
decade, a team from Harvard Business School, London School of Economics,
McKinsey & Company, and Stanford has systematically surveyed global
management. We have developed a tool to measure management practices across
operational management, monitoring, targets, and people management. We scored
each dimension on a range of practices to generate an overall management score,
surveying over 10,000 firms in 20 countries. This has allowed us to create the
first global database of management practices.
Well managed firms thrash their poorly managed competitors. They
make more money, grow faster, have far higher stock market values, and survive
for longer.
Second, when it comes to overall management, American firms
outperform all others. This U.S. dominance occurs in the manufacturing, retail,
and healthcare sectors (but interestingly, not in high schools). Japanese,
German, and Swedish firms follow closely behind. In contrast, developing
countries like Brazil, China, and India lag at the bottom of the management
charts. Southern European countries like Portugal and Greece appear to have
management practices barely better than those of most developing countries. In
the middle stand countries like the UK, France, Italy, and Australia, which
have reasonable but not brilliant management practices.
While the ranking of countries is certainly eye-catching,
the real story lies within the countries. Almost 90% of the cross-country differences
are driven by the size of the “tail” of really badly managed firms within each
country. Countries like the U.S. that excel have hardly any badly managed
firms, while those like India that have low average scores have a mass of very
badly managed firms pulling down their averages.
Every country has some world-class firms. But while there
are many of these extremely badly managed, every country also hosts some
excellent firms. Even bottom-ranking India has dozens of firms that use
worldclass management practices. A key takeaway is that individual companies
are not trapped by the national environments in which they operate — there are
top performers in all countries surveyed. Conversely, being in a world-class
environment like the U.S. does not guarantee success. Even in America, more
than 15% of firms are so badly managed that they are worse than the average
Chinese or Indian firm.
What is the secret sauce of management success? One of the
biggest drivers of these differences is variation in people management.
American firms are ruthless at rapidly rewarding and promoting good employees
and retraining or firing bad employees. The reasons are threefold (1) The U.S.
has tougher levels of competition. Large and open U.S. markets generate the
type of rapid management evolution that allows only the best-managed firms to
survive. (2) Human capital is important. America traditionally gets far more of
its population into college than other nations. (3) The U..S has more flexible labor markets. It
is much easier to hire and fire employees.
Many developing-country firms, even while trying to
implement new techniques like Lean Management, ignore the fact that labor is
different from other “inputs.” Many of the Chinese firms surveyed did not even
employ managers who spoke the same language as the workers, relying on
interpreters or basic sign-language for communication. As you can imagine, this
does not lead to a feeling of mutual support between management and workers.
But the U.S. should not be complacent. Other countries equal
or better the U.S. in some of the other areas of management we examined, such
as careful monitoring, lean production, and sensible targets. The manufacturing
prowess of Germany, has helped it weather the recent downturn so well, is built
upon such advantages. Furthermore, although Chinese management practices are
well below U.S. standards, they showed the fastest improvement since 2006 of
any country we have looked at.
What lessons emerge for others wanting to reach the top of
the ranking? Across all countries, organizations that properly incentivize
talented workers, whether through promotion, pay, or other rewards, outperform
others. As best practices spread and firms continue to implement these
techniques they will narrow the existing gaps, reaping huge growth and
profitability gains.
No comments:
Post a Comment
If you want me to reply to you separately, leave your e mail id and cell number here. Otherwise I will give my reply here itself. Give me 2-3 days to reply. Also give ideas on what subject you may want me to tackle. Thanks, Palekar.